Beware of Christian “Anti-Zionists”

Christian Anti-Zionism, like it’s twin Christian AntiSemitism, is a dangerous theological movement with genocidal intentions. Christian AntiSemitism uses as it’s argument that the Jews, who “killed Christ”, are inherently evil, forsaken by God, and thus should be subjected to the horrible treatment that Jews have suffered since the fall of the second Temple. Christian Anti-Zionism is a slightly modified Christian antisemitic movement, that holds as it’s belief that Jews are no longer God’s Chosen People, and thus are no longer the heirs of God’s promises and gifts. They believe the Jews as a people, no longer have any right to the Holy Land, and have now thrown their support behind the Palestinian Arabs, whose goal is the elimination of the Jewish state, and the Jewish people. Make no mistake, the intentions of Christian Anti-Zionism is genocidal. They see the Jews as a forever cursed people, who are damned to eternal Hell Fire. Such a nasty theological belief obviously will produce an unloving and even hateful attitude towards Jews. This explains why there is no condemnation of Palestinian Arab terrorism, which targets Jews…any Jew.

In my debates with Christian Anti-Zionists, Matthew 21, the “Wicked Vinedressers” is used frequently as proof that God has abandoned the Jews:

” “Hear another parable: There was a certain landowner who planted a vineyard and set a hedge around it, dug a winepress in it and built a tower. And he leased it to vinedressers and went into a far country. 34 Now when vintage-time drew near, he sent his servants to the vinedressers, that they might receive its fruit. 35 And the vinedressers took his servants, beat one, killed one, and stoned another. 36 Again he sent other servants, more than the first, and they did likewise to them. 37 Then last of all he sent his son to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ 38 But when the vinedressers saw the son, they said among themselves, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance.’ 39 So they took him and cast him out of the vineyard and killed him.

40 “Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those vinedressers?”

41 They said to Him, “He will destroy those wicked men miserably, and lease his vineyard to other vinedressers who will render to him the fruits in their seasons.”

42 Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures:

‘The stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief cornerstone.
This was the Lord’s doing,
And it is marvelous in our eyes’?
43 “Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it.”

The Vindressers are the leaders, as are the “builders”. Christ was here speaking of the leaders, but for some reason, Christian anti-Zionists have taken that to mean…the Jewish people. The Kingdom of God will be taken from them, and given to another nation. Indeed, for Christ informs us that “The meek shall inherit the earth”, or the new kingdom. Christian Anti-Zionists are simply reading into the parable their own anti-Jewish bigotry. Jesus made it quite clear several times, that Israel has not been forsaken, and they yet have a future:

“Then Peter answered and said to Him, “See, we have left all and followed You. Therefore what shall we have?”

28 So Jesus said to them, “Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.” Matthew 19


“Therefore, when they [the Apostles] had come together, they asked Him, saying, “Lord, will You at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?” 7 And He said to them, “It is not for you to know times or seasons which the Father has put in His own authority.” Acts 1

The Apostles asked Jesus when He would restore sovereignty to Israel. Jesus response, was not “It’s not going to happen”, His response was that it was not for them to know when it would happen. Why would they ask this question if the Jewish people had been forsaken by God?

Christian Anti-Zionists also are fond of quoting Galatians 3:

“For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”

What did Paul mean here? This means that there is no discrimination . Everyone who is of faith are heirs to the promise….It doesnt mean that there will no longer be a distinction between nations, peoples etc etc, because Rev. 21 shows that there will still be “nations”:

“The Glory of the New Jerusalem

22 But I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. 23 The city had no need of the sun or of the moon to shine in it,[j] for the glory[k] of God illuminated it. The Lamb is its light. 24 And the nations of those who are saved shall walk in its light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory and honor into it.[m] 25 Its gates shall not be shut at all by day (there shall be no night there). 26 And they shall bring the glory and the honor of the nations into it.” 27

“The Gentiles shall come to your light,
And kings to the brightness of your rising.
4 “Lift up your eyes all around, and see:
They all gather together, they come to you;
Your sons shall come from afar,
And your daughters shall be nursed at your side.
5 Then you shall see and become radiant,
And your heart shall swell with joy;
Because the abundance of the sea shall be turned to you,
The wealth of the Gentiles shall come to you.” Isaiah 60

In short, all nations will be treated equally before God. Doesnt mean that there will no longer be nations, Jews, gentiles, males nor females.

Christian Anti-Zionists will tell us that:

“The true Christians in this group know full well that the Jewish people need to be SAVED, and their focus is not on returning them to a piece of property over in the Middle East, but on giving them the Gospel, with the opportunity for salvation, no matter where they live in the world!.”

But to oppose the rights of Jews to their homeland, and thus render them once again subjected to oppression, massacres and genocides, committed by those who called themselves Christians, and then to preach the Gospel to them is not only “preaching the Gospel without love”, but insulting. Christian Zionists show the love of Christ and the Gospel through action. Christian Zionists have shown this love through their support of Israel, some Christian Zionists have even volunteered as soldiers to defend the Jewish state, and many others have defended Israel and the Jewish people from anti-Semitic lies, anti-Israeli propaganda via websites, organizations, speeches etc etc. This is done out of sincere love, not through insincere preaching. For how can you preach the Gospel to someone, when your every act is hostile towards them? How can you preach the Gospel to the Jews, when you are supporting their enemies, who don’t even make it secret that their true goal is the elimination of the Jewish people? That is not love.

Apostle Paul, no doubt a witness to the rising anti-Jewish sentiment growing in the Church of his time, wrote this as a counter to this unholy movement:

“I say then, has God cast away His people? Certainly not! For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not cast away His people whom He foreknew….

For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:

“The Deliverer will come out of Zion,
And He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob;
For this is My covenant with them,
When I take away their sins.”

Concerning the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers. For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. For as you were once disobedient to God, yet have now obtained mercy through their disobedience, even so these also have now been disobedient, that through the mercy shown you they also may obtain mercy. For God has committed them all to disobedience, that He might have mercy on all.” Romans 11

To sum it up, Paul here confirms that not only has not God rejected the Jewish people, they are destined for Salvation, and despite their current hostility towards the Gospel, they remain beloved by God and that “the gifts and calling” for and to the Jewish people are “irrevocable”. The word irrevocable means:

“not able to be changed, reversed, or recovered; final.
“an irrevocable step”
synonyms: irreversible, unalterable, unchangeable, immutable, final, binding, permanent, carved in stone;”

That means, no matter how much the Christian Anti-Zionists trumpet their anti-Jewish arguments, they will be unable to change what God has made unchangeable. Indeed, for one of the gifts God bestowed on the Jewish people, is the Holy Land. In fact, this act by the world to change what is unchangeable, will bring about Judgement:

“For behold, in those days and at that time,
When I bring back the captives of Judah and Jerusalem,
I will also gather all nations,
And bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat;
And I will enter into judgment with them there
On account of My people, My heritage Israel,
Whom they have scattered among the nations;
They have also divided up My land.” Joel 3

Here buried in the Old Testament (which Christian Anti-Zionists falsely claim is irrelevant), is a warning from God concerning a future punishment on the nations for scattering the Jewish people, and dividing (Note the word “Partition) up the land God gave to His “heritage Israel”. Also something that really should raise our eyebrows is the fact that this punishment occurs after God brings the Israelis back into “Judah and Jerusalem”. It seems the gathering of the nations is certainly occurring, because almost the entire International Community is gathering against Israel…including the Christian Anti-Zionists.

Perhaps they should start reading the OT, after all Jesus said:

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets (the so-called Old Testament)). I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.”

And that would include Joel 3, and all the writings of the Prophets.

Beware of Christian Anti-Zionists. Woe unto Christian Anti-Zionists, because they have followed the world into Anti-Zionism….For they are all heading into the Valley of Jehoshaphat.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

The Irrational Stance on Iran

Iran is racing ahead and is on the verge of producing nuclear bombs. The window of opportunity to halt their program is closing fast. And yet, much of the media continues to parrot the Obama administration’s line that attacking Iran is a “bad idea“. Sanctions are not working, and Obama persists in negotiating with Iran, thus intentionally making an Israeli strike difficult. Joel Brinkley’s Kansas City Star’s article, “An Israeli attack on Iran would be a disastrous idea” highlights the indifferent attitude of those opposed to halting Iran’s nuke program militarily.

“President Obama stood up to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week and refused to be dragged into still another war — this one against Iran.”

Joel, leads readers to believe that Netanyahu is demanding that the US help fight a war with Iran on Israel’s behalf. But in fact the Israelis are asking for a green light for they themselves to carry out a military mission, to halt Iran’s diabolical Nuclear program. The US has so far, not provided the OK, citing many excuses such as destabilization of the Mid-East, higher energy prices, and of course “not wanting to be dragged into another war”. Concerns not cited during the 1991 Gulf War, when we invaded Iraq to protect Kuwait and the Saudis, and the wars after 911. Notice the words “…Obama stood up to…Netanyahu”, as if the Israelis controls US presidents, a common canard. Interestingly, one of my staunchest anti-Israel opponents made a similar claim about two weeks ago at “Talk Rational”.

Of course, Joel was aware of what Bibi actually was asking for because a few lines later he quotes Bibi who told Obama, that, “Israel must have the ability to defend itself, by itself, against any threat.” “By itself”, which is what Israel has been doing since 1948. The US has never sent it’s soldiers to assist Israel in any of it’s wars with her enemies….not once. Why? To avoid the alienation of it’s so-called Arab allies.

After admitting that Iran is most likely pursuing nukes, Joel writes that “Nonetheless, an Israeli attack would be a great mistake” because ‘Hezbollah…has tens of thousands of rockets and missiles, more than most governments in the world’ and that “All that firepower would decimate the [Israeli] state.”

So, a terrorist organization armed with conventional weapons is a lesser threat then a nuclear armed Islamist Iranian state? Doesn’t make sense does it? But our friend, quoting Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, agrees that “Iran [is] a ‘rational actor,’” Really? Are the Ayatollahs really “rational”? Was it rational of them sending all those kids to run through Iraqi mine-fields, blowing themselves up to pave a mine-free path into Iraq for their tanks and soldiers? Is it rational to deny the Holocaust while simultaneously threatening to wipe Israel off the map, and the Israeli Jews? Is it rational to arm Hamas and Hezbollah, Islamist terrorist organizations dedicated to a Final Solution? Because it doesn’t sound rational to me, nor is it rational to allow Islamists to acquire nukes…..Martyrdom and nukes, makes for a bad combination.

“At the same time, for years Iran has been developing intercontinental ballistic missiles that obviously would have no trouble reaching Tel Aviv.
Nothing would make both Iran and Hezbollah happier than to be handed the excuse to fire everything they have at Israel. For Iran, particularly, destroying the “Zionist entity” has long been its goal.”

Has long been it’s goal? I don’t know if Joel knows it or not, but the Islamists already have their excuse….the existence of a Jewish state is their excuse! And has it ever occurred to these shallow thinkers, that should the Islamists acquire nukes, Israel’s defense against Hamas and Hezbollah will be much harder? It will force Israel to show much more restraint, just to avoid a nuclear shoot out between it and Iran, thus endangering the lives of Israeli civilians, and strengthening the terrorist proxies of Iran and the Islamic world. Iran must not be allowed to obtain nukes, period! And not only for Israel’s sakes, but for all those dissenters and minorities being persecuted by Islamists in Africa and the Middle-East. If they get nukes, there will be no military interventions on their behalf, simply to avoid nuclear war…and thus condemning them to suffer modern day Dhimmitude, and for us? More terrorism.

“And that would almost certainly force the U.S., Israel’s only true ally, to come to its aid, drawing the U.S. into war.”

Judging by America’s attitude during the Holocaust and Israel’s wars with the genocidal Arab states, it’s highly likely that the US will take a “neutral” position, leaving Israel to fight alone. Even now, it appears the US gov. has already made that decision.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Examining Joel 3

The book of the Prophet Joel, chapter 3, reveals some of the main reasons that God will judge all nations, as well as providing a glimpse of end time events concerning Israel, and all nations who, by this time will be hostile towards her.

““For behold, in those days and at that time,
When I bring back the captives of Judah and Jerusalem,
2 I will also gather all nations,
And bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat;
And I will enter into judgment with them there
On account of My people, My heritage Israel,
Whom they have scattered among the nations;
They have also divided up My land.”

Lets break this down:

“For behold, in those days and at that time,
When I bring back the captives of Judah and Jerusalem,…”

Here, God reveals to Joel, that a time was coming when He would restore the Jewish state, and that during those days:

“I will also gather all nations,
And bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat…”

This means that during the time of the newly restored Jewish state, God would gather all nations to Israel where He will:

“enter into judgment with them there
On account of My people, My heritage Israel…”

He judges the nations for His people Israel because for many years the nations mistreated the Jewish people:

“Whom they have scattered among the nations;
They have also divided up My land.”

Jews were expelled from country to country during their long history without their state. And after returning to their land, the nations have unjustly divided it with the Arabs, whose only interest in the land is the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people. We are witnessing the efforts of the nations, through the UN, to divide Judea and Jerusalem…and sadly, this division of the land will be a reality in the near future. God exposes the true intentions of the world’s “Land for Peace” process:

“Indeed, what have you to do with Me,
O Tyre and Sidon, and all the coasts of Philistia?
Will you retaliate against Me?
But if you retaliate against Me,
Swiftly and speedily I will return your retaliation upon your own head…”

God here exposes the heart of modern Lebanon and Philistia which corresponds to the modern “Palestinians”. Their abuse of the Jews and their covetous desire for Judea and Jerusalem, is motivated by a hatred of the God of Israel. So by attacking the Jews, the nations are really directing their hatred against the God of Israel. God warns them that He will repay them….and “speedily”.

“Because you have taken My silver and My gold,
And have carried into your temples My prized possessions.
6 Also the people of Judah and the people of Jerusalem
You have sold to the Greeks,
That you may remove them far from their borders.”

The Greeks are representative of the Europeans, who will collaborate with the Arab nations in exiling many Jews. Even now the EU is a major player in the so-called Peace Process, and is becoming ever more hostile towards Israel. Before the creation of Israel, Western leaders resisted Jewish immigration to Judea, and the British actually assisted the Arab armies in the War of 48.…only 3 years after the Nazi Holocaust, a genocide aided by both European and Arab leaders. One gets the feeling that the Nazi Holocaust was in fact a counter to the Zionist movement. By exterminating the Jews, there would be no Jews to restore the Jewish state. They failed, but they havent given up their plans.

“Proclaim this among the nations:
“Prepare for war!
Wake up the mighty men,
Let all the men of war draw near,
Let them come up.
10 Beat your plowshares into swords
And your pruning hooks into spears…”

Here we find the meaning of God’s gathering the nations to Israel for judgment. It is a call for war. It is the final war between Israel and her enemies. The world is running out of patience with Israel and anti-Semitism is on the rise. Most of the citizens of the world are anti-Israel and it wont be long before some pretense is found to invade Israel. One pretense already exists according to the International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect:

“The escalation of violence in Gaza raised serious questions about using RtoP to urge international action to protect civilians in the conflict. RtoP has been referred to, notably by Richard Falk, UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, but also by others who claim that crimes committed in Gaza have reached the threshold of RtoP crimes. Falk called into question the implementation of RtoP in Libya in an April 2011 opinion piece for Al-Jazeera, stating that action was taken to protect Libyan civilians, however a similar response was absent as a measure to aid the people of Gaza.”

The “human rights” pretense will ultimately be used as an excuse to invade Israel, to assist Hamas and the PLO in destroying Israel. They will fail of course because God has other plans, which does not include the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people.

“Assemble and come, all you nations,
And gather together all around.
Cause Your mighty ones to go down there, O Lord.”

This is simply amazing! The “mighty ones” are identified as the Angelic army in Zechariah 14:

“Thus the Lord my God will come,
And all the saints [Angels] with You.”

The Angelic Army, led by the Lord, will come down and destroy the armies of the nations attacking Israel. Which is what Jesus is speaking of in Luke 21!

““Let the nations be wakened, and come up to the Valley of Jehoshaphat;
For there I will sit to judge all the surrounding nations.
13 Put in the sickle, for the harvest is ripe.
Come, go down;
For the winepress is full,
The vats overflow—
For their wickedness is great.”

The Lord, Who is also the Messiah, will be the one who tramples the grapes in the winepress, just as Jesus says in Revelations. This will be done for His people Israel, which contradicts the claims that National Israel has been replaced by the Church, and therefore is no longer relevant. Here in the Book of Joel, the Messiah and His Angels will destroy the armies of the nations for Israel!

“Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision!
For the day of the Lord is near in the valley of decision.
15 The sun and moon will grow dark,
And the stars will diminish their brightness.
16 The Lord also will roar from Zion,
And utter His voice from Jerusalem;
The heavens and earth will shake;
But the Lord will be a shelter for His people,
And the strength of the children of Israel.”

When the “mighty ones” come down from Heaven, the sun, moon and stars will grow dark. Sounds familiar? Yes, Jesus in Luke 21 and Matthew 24 is repeating (and thus confirming) Joel 3 and Zechariah 12-14. The Messiah will be a shelter for the children of Israel, those who escapes exile and the nations’ Final Solution. The claim that nations are experiencing turmoil because of their treatment of Israel doesn’t sound farfetched after reading the Book of Joel. Obviously there is truth in that claim, because here, God judges all nations for their treatment of the Jews and Israel. We are living in very interesting times….dangerous, but interesting.

““So you shall know that I am the Lord your God,
Dwelling in Zion My holy mountain.
Then Jerusalem shall be holy,
And no aliens shall ever pass through her again.”

After the final deliverance of Israel from the anti-Semitic nations, Jerusalem and Judea will never see war again, nor will the Jews be surrounded by hostile bigots.

“Egypt shall be a desolation,
And Edom a desolate wilderness,
Because of violence against the people of Judah,
For they have shed innocent blood in their land.”

Egypt, Lebanon, Philistine (Palestine), Edom (Jordan) as well as the other Islamic states, will become desolations….what they have attempted against Israel, will happen to them. Also noticed that God holds them responsible for the violence, and murder they’ve committed against the Jews “in their land”. This is strong evidence that God does not want hostile Arabs in Israel, and supports the IDF in the fullest. Notice in Zechariah 14, when the Angelic army is destroying the enemies of Israel:

“Judah also will fight at Jerusalem.
And the wealth of all the surrounding nations
Shall be gathered together:
Gold, silver, and apparel in great abundance.”

The Angelic army and the IDF will be fighting side by side, against the Satanic led Gentile armies, and the Jews will loot those who looted them. Clearly “I support the IDF” is worn on the sleeve of God. He does not change…for our God “is a man of war” (Exodus 15).

“But Judah shall abide forever,
And Jerusalem from generation to generation.
21 For I will acquit them of the guilt of bloodshed, whom I had not acquitted;
For the Lord dwells in Zion.”

God makes a promise to the Jews, and a warning for the nations. Israel is eternal, you will not succeed in destroying the Jews…Haman of Persia, Pharaoh, the Greeks, the German Nazis, the Crusaders…all failed. Israel has returned on the map, and the Jews have outlasted all their would be exterminators….because their God cannot be defeated.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Michael Omer’s “Israel doesn’t thank the US enough”

Recently, an article was written in the Jerusalem Post by a Michael Omer, criticizing what he believes to be Israeli ungratefulness of US loyalty to Israel. He writes that:

“All healthy relationships require affirmation. When only one party [The US] expresses affection, praise and love, the other feels resentful and taken for granted. In the case of the “unshakeable” relationship between Israel and the United States, that affirmation is a one-way street… When American leaders and opinion-makers highlight the military, financial, diplomatic and moral support they give Israel, Israelis insist it’s not enough…Israeli leaders only harm themselves by projecting the perception that their national interests supersede those of their lone patron state. The United States has interests of its own, and while Israel may very well be one of them, it would serve the American and Israeli publics to be reminded why exactly that is.”

The support for Israel, from the US government isn’t because of love for Israel, but because most American voters support Israel, possessing the power to punish politicians who make their anti-Israel sentiments public, at the ballot box, as Paul Findley discovered after his failed campaign to become a two-time congressman. The pro-Israel voting constituency must be appeased if politicians are to be elected for public office, and politicians are well aware of this…and hence the “love and praise“ for Israel (especially from Republicans) during campaigning. After obtaining office however, American leaders pursue policies which are dangerous to Israel’s security, to appease the Gulf Oil states, whom the US relies on for a significant portion of their oil imports. Omer perpetuates the often repeated line:

“Meanwhile, the main area that the US views as a strategic interest vis-à-vis Israel is the very issue the current government in Jerusalem appears furthest from advancing – making peace with the Palestinians. As countless American leaders have argued, achieving Middle East peace is a fundamental strategic, financial and military interest of Washington.”

And this is where Israel finds public statements about “love and praise” for Israel a bit suspect. Because for one, while Palestinian leaders informs their own people about their ultimate plans to destroy Israel and thus the Israeli Jews, via PA TV, schools and mosques, US leaders pretends the Palestinians are true peace partners. The Palestinians have adopted their own planned Final Solution (as well as the Nazi Salute), and to suggest the Jews make peace with modern Nazis, is tantamount to a demand that the Jews of Europe make peace with the German Nazis. When the US says “Peace” it means the creation of a modern Islamo-Nazi state set up inside Israel, and you can be sure the US, in order to avoid offending the Gulf Oil states, will not send a single soldier to aid the Israelis should they find themselves on the losing side of an inevitable war. Examining US attitude towards the Israelis during the War of 1948, 67 and 73, shows just how much love and praise US elites have for the Israelis.

During the 1948 War, the US slaps an arms embargo on the Israelis knowing full well that the Arabs were being trained, supplied and in case of the Jordanians, led by the British, in addition to knowing the Israelis had little to no weapons to defend themselves (thank God they managed to smuggle weapons from the Czechs, or they would surely have been slaughtered, while the US stood by and watched). That annual aid package to Israel? As Kissinger proposed, after the State and Defense departments initially rejected it, as a means to influence the Israelis to “moderate their territorial claims” and to ensure the Israelis never have a need to use their nukes. Love, would have assisted the Israelis without demanding they make harmful compromises for the sake of appeasing the Gulf Oil states, particularly the Saudis. The US government has shown itself to willingly sacrifice the Israelis to maintain access to Arab oil and so Omer‘s ridicule of the line “throwing Israel under the bus” is unwarranted…That’s what Omer, and others like him, really means when they say “American interests”. Omer than further attacks Israel by stating:

“While Israel is busy touting its self-declared status of “the only democracy in the Middle East,” the United States has spent the past decade, upwards of $1 trillion and sacrificed thousands of lives to create others.”

Really? Are those democracies the US is helping set up in the Middle-East? Like in Libya, whose new leaders informs us that Sharia Law shall be state law? Or how about in Egypt where the Muslim Brotherhood, falsely dubbed by US elites as a moderate organization, and the Sulafists, have established themselves as the future ruling elites? Never mind the brutal dictatorships the US help established in Latin America, so that they could assist US and other foreign corporations in exploiting poor Latin Americans. If there is a true democracy in any part of the globe, it would be the state of Israel. Not only does Israel protect the rights of minorities in it’s state (including those sworn to it’s destruction), it also doesn’t indulge nation building missions to set up oppressive regimes, to protect commercial interests of rapacious corporations. So, until the US government becomes serious about Israel’s security needs, I see no reason why Israel should praise and thank the US government for rhetorical public statements about love and praise for Israel, because, if the existence of a pro-Israel voting public was absent, the US government wouldn’t even give Israel token support.

To learn about the ongoing campaign to break US support for Israel, read Mitchell Bard’s book “The Arab Lobby”, which documents the Oil Industry, the Arabs‘, and their allies’ goal to break support for Israel.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Jewish Invader Myth

One of the most frequent lies told about modern Israel is the lie that Jews stole the land from the Palestinians, who are often touted as being the true natives of Palestine. This lie can easily be disproved by going back and examine documents and books before the restoration of the Israeli state. So lets begin shall we?

The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica gives a vivid description of the population of Palestine:

“The inhabitants of Palestine are composed of a large number of elements, differing widely in ethnological affinities, language and religion. It may be interesting to mention, as an illustration of their heterogeneousness, that early in the 20th century a list of no less than fifty languages, spoken in Jerusalem as vernaculars, was there drawn up by a party of men whose various official positions enabled them to possess accurate information on the subject.1 It is therefore no easy task to write concisely and at the same time with sufficient fullness on the ethnology of Palestine.

There are two classes into which the population of Palestine can be divided – the nomadic and the sedentary. The former is especially characteristic of Eastern Palestine, though Western Palestine [modern Israel*]also contains its full share. The pure Arab origin of the Bedouins is recognized in common conversation in the country, the word ” Arab ” being almost restricted to denote these wanderers, and seldom applied to the dwellers in towns and villages. It should be mentioned that there is another, entirely independent, nomad race, .the despised Nowar, who correspond to the gipsies or tinkers of European countries. These people live under the poorest conditions, by doing smith’s work; they speak among themselves a Romani dialect, much contaminated with Arabic in its vocabulary….

New elements no doubt came in under the Assyrian, Persian and Roman dominations, and in more recent times there has been much contamination…. There are very large contingents from the Mediterranean countries, especially Armenia, Greece and Italy, principally engaged in trade. The extraordinary development of Jewish colonization has since 1870 effected a revolution in the balance of population in some parts of the country, notably in Jerusalem… Turkoman settlements in the Jaulan, a number of Persians, and a fairly large Afghan colony that since 1905 has established itself in Jaffa. The Mutawileh (Motawila), who form the majority of the inhabitants of the villages north-west of Galilee…Some tribes of Kurds live in tents and huts near Lake Huleh…[a] Bosnian colony established at Caesarea Palestina…Circassian settlements…There was formerly a large Sudanese and Algerian element in the population…Algerians however still maintain themselves in parts of Galilee…the Samaritan sect in Nablus (Shechem); a gradually disappearing body…”

So we see that Palestine was settled by many groups from around the world who established their own villages and quarters. Now lets examine land purchases by the Jews by examining statements made to the Royal Peel Commission by the Mufti Hajj Amin, who later became a top Arab Nazi:

MUFTI: First of all I would like to say that one of the members of our Committee will deal later with the land question, but nevertheless I will give you the figures. At the time of the Occupation the Jews held about 100,000 dunams.

SIR L. HAMMOND: What year?

MUFTI: At the date of the British Occupation.

SIR L. HAMMOND: And now they hold how much?

MUFTI: About 1,500,000 dunams: 1,200,000 dunams already registered in the name of the Jewish holders, but there are 300,000 dunams which are the subject of written agreements, and which have not yet been registered in the Land Registry. That does not, of course, include the land which was assigned, about 100,000 dunams….

MUFTI: They were not prevented from selling the land, and mostly the country was in such economic condition as facilitated the sale. If the Government had the interest of these poor people at heart they should have prevented sales and these people would not have been evicted from their land. A large part of these lands belong to absentee landlords who sold the land over the heads of their tenants, who were forcibly evicted. The majority of these landlords were absentees who sold their land over the heads of their tenants. Not Palestinians but Lebanese.

By 1937, the Jews had legally purchased almost 350,000 acres of land, and by the 40s they owned about 500,000 acres….in a country populated mostly by foreign immigrant ethnics groups, which was not owned by any one ethnic group. So, if Armenians, Germans, Italians and others were allowed to purchase land to build their villages and colonies, why not the true natives, the Jews? And as for the mass eviction charge, it was determined by the Royal Peel Commission to be false, as Jews purchased most of their land in areas uninhabited. Next we examine Arab immigration into West Palestine, and I will be quoting sources who are critical of Joan Peter’s book “From Time Immemorial”.

Now it is widely accepted that all of Palestine (that includes modern Jordan), had a population of no more than 600,000…we are only interested in the numbers in West Palestine that became modern Israel. Here are the numbers from Peter’s critics:

“Now we must consider the number of non-Jews living in those areas. According to Mrs. Peters (again on page 251), and apparently Mr. Sanders accepts her view, they numbered about 92,300, of which nearly 38,000 were Christians (making the number of Muslims about 54,300). But the Ottoman census figures in Karpat’s table (pages 262 and 271 of his article) give the number of Muslims as 158,379 and of the Christians as 39,884, making a total number of 198,263 non-Jews in “the Jewish settled areas.” If we use Cuinet’s own figures we still do not get an estimate of the non-Jewish population that brings us much closer to the number of non-Jews claimed by Mrs. Peters. According to Cuinet’s data on the seven Ottoman subdistricts comprising “the Jewish-settled areas” we have 124,686 Muslims and 61,964 Christians, a total of 186,263 non-Jews.”

So according to the 1893 Ottoman Census we have 186,263-198,263 non-Jews living in West Palestine. According to the British Census taken in 1922:

“The 1922 census of Palestine was the first census carried out by the authorities of the British Mandate of Palestine, on 23 October 1922.[1]
The reported population was 757,182, including the military and persons of foreign nationality. The division into religious groups was 590,390 Muslims, 83,694 Jews, 73,024 Christians, 7,028 Druze, 1,454 Hindus, 808 Sikhs, 265 Bahais, 156 Metawalis, and 163 Samaritans.[2]”

Subtract the 83,694 Jews, the non-Jewish population in West Palestine increased from 200,000 to about 670,000 in less then 30 years. Pro-Palestinian narrators tell us this was by natural increase, which is ridiculous…that’s a 470,000 increase in the non-Jewish population in less then 30 years. Obviously, there was significant Arab immigration occurring, which was allowed by the British…for example:

“In 1920 the British set Jewish Immigration quotas, restricting Jewish immigration.  The British requested the French to STOP monitoring illegal Arab immigration along the border of Lebanon and Syria with West Palestine (Israel) allowing free immigration of Arabs into Western Palestine [Israel].10 [10] Public Record Office, Kew Gardens, Foreign Office, Great Britain  371/20819; see also interview between the officer administering the Government (OAG) and Shertok, October 16, 1937.


“”So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population.” Martin Gilbert, Churchill, vol. 5, p. 1072.

Even Peter’s critics were forced to admit: “As with all successful disinformation, the distortions are placed within a wider context of truth; not everything Peters says is a lie. Palestine was in fact sparsely populated when Jewish colonization began. Arab nationalism did not yet exist, let alone Palestinian nationalism. When the British took over they unjustly restricted Jewish immigration into Palestine while Arabs immigrated into the territory. After the Arab violence of the late 1930s, British appeasement slowed Jewish immigration to a trickle. Ultimately, Jews who sought to escape the Holocaust were turned away from the Jewish National Home, even while “emergency arrangements” were taken to bring in Arab immigrant laborers.”

Indeed the British allowed illegal Arab immigration, to derail the Zionist Project…but not only that, the British encouraged the Arabs to war against the Zionists. In 2010 the US Army/CIA released more de-classifies documents shedding more light about the Nazis and the Palestinian alliance. But what got my attention were these cabled statements:

“In October 1945, the report says, the British head of Palestine’s Criminal Investigation Division told the assistant American military attaché in Cairo that the mufti might be the only force able to unite the Palestine Arabs and “cool off the Zionists. Of course, we can’t do it, but it might not be such a damn bad idea at that.”

Then we have the British leading the Arab army against the IDF in the 48 War:

“[sir General John Bagot Glubb] was a British soldier, scholar and author, best known for leading and training Transjordan’s Arab Legion 1939-1956 as its commanding general…During the 1948 Arab–Israeli War the Arab legion was considered the strongest Arab army involved in the war. Glubb led the Arab Legion across Jordan to occupy the West Bank.”

Under Glubb’s command, the Jews of East Jerusalem and the “West Bank” were massacred and cleansed from their homes and lands, and were barred for almost 20 years from worshiping at the Temple Mount. While the Brits supplied and led the Arab armies during their genocidal Jihad against Israel, the US State Dept. slapped an arms embargo on “Palestine” forcing the Israelis to smuggle weapons from the Czechs.

“September 22, 1947: Loy Henderson, director the State Department’s Near East Agency, addresses a memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall in which he argues against United States’ advocacy of the United Nations proposal to partition Palestine.

October 10, 1947: The Joint Chiefs of Staff argue in a memorandum entitled “The Problem of Palestine” that the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states would enable the Soviet Union to replace the United States and Great Britain in the region and would endanger United States access to Middle East oil.

November 24, 1947: Secretary of State George Marshall writes to Under Secretary of State Robert Lovett to inform him that British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin had told him that British intelligence indicated that Jewish groups moving illegally from the Balkan states to Palestine included many Communists.

December 5, 1947: Secretary of State George Marshall announces that the State Department is imposing an embargo on all shipments of arms to the Middle East.

After the 67 War, after Israel captured the “West Bank” and East Jerusalem, Britain authored Resolution 242 which called for the return of Gaza and the West Bank back to Egypt and Jordan, client states of the British, and not to a “Palestinian” people because there were none. Why did the Brits and the US elite go along with this dreadful plot? OIL, and money. In 1933, Rockefeller’s Standard Oil of California acquired oil drilling contracts in Saudi Arabia, a then client state of the British which today “[t]here are more than 150 joint ventures between British and Saudi Companies and some 30,000 British nationals are living and working in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is the United Kingdom’s primary trading partner in the Middle East.”,

The Saudis have the oil, and plenty of it, and the greedy were willing to sacrifice the lives of the Holocaust survivors of Israel, to get it. Even during the 73 War, when the Israelis were on the verge of losing, the US State and Defense departments:

“opposed [sending arms to Israel]. Kissinger was the sole dissenter; he said that if the US refused aid, Israel would have little incentive to conform to American views in postwar diplomacy. Kissinger argued the sending of U.S. aid might cause Israel to moderate its territorial claims, but this thesis raised a protracted debate whether U.S. aid was likely to make it more accommodating or more intransigent toward the Arab world.[210]” Wiki George Lenczowski, American Presidents and the Middle East (1990), p.129

“Anecdotal evidence suggests that Kissinger told Sadat that the reason for the U.S. airlift was that the Israelis were close to “going nuclear.” Wiki Yom Kippur War, Farr, Warner D. “The Third Temple’s Holy of Holies: Israel’s Nuclear Weapons.” Counterproliferation Paper No. 2, USAF Counterproliferation Center, Air War College, September 1999.

The Israelis had to use the nuclear threat, to force a change in US policy regarding US arms to Israel…and thus the annual aid package to Israel that anti-Zionists love to whine about…aid not really meant to protect Israel, but to ensure Israel doesn’t threaten the Arabs with the use of nukes. Oh and apparently to influence Israel’s behavior regarding “territorial claims”.

Before I end this part, a word about the “Palestinian” refugees:

“Since 1948 we have been demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But we ourselves are the ones who encouraged them to leave. Only a few months separated our call to them to leave and our appeal to the United Nations to resolve on their return.” ~ Haled al Azm, the Syrian Prime Minister in 1948­49 in his Memoirs.

Next part, I will expose the myth of the “Innocent Palestinians” by exposing their alliance with the Nazis to exterminate the Jews, the roots of their Terrorist organizations, and their starting and continuing the current conflict.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Prof. Gerald Steinberg: “The Assault on Israel as the Nation State of the Jewish People”

Professor Gerald Steinberg exposes the modern attempt to destroy Israel through political warfare.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Refuting the Zionist control the Bank and Media Myth

This is part 2 of my Zionist controls the Banks Myth, and I will also be examining the claim of Zionist control of International Media. In this article we will be looking at the institutions who are the major stock owners of the banks and media, so lets begin.

Top ten Banks as of 2011:

1. Citibank (Citigroup); Top Stock owner FMR LLC (Fidelity Investments), 114,721,008 shares. FMR LLC founder Edward Johnson II, Key people: Edward Johnson, III (Chairman & CEO), Abigail Johnson (President, Fidelity Personal Workplace and Institutional Services), Kathleen Murphy (President, Fidelity Personal Investing). Johnson surname is not a Jewish surname, but is of Norman (English) origin, which arose in England with the Norman conquest. (sources Yahoo Finance and

2. JP Morgan Chase; Top Stock owner: STATE STREET CORPORATION at 155,008,429 shares: Jay Hooley (President and CEO), of SSC. The Hooley surname is English in origin.

3. HBC Bank; Top stock owner: FMR LLC (Fidelity Investments) at 12,709,655 shares. See Johnson family above.

4. Bank of America; Top stock owner: STATE STREET CORPORATION at 455,747,401 shares. See Jay Hooley above.

5. Credit Agricole Group; French bank not listed on Yahoo Finance.

6. Royal Bank of Scotland: “The Royal Bank of Scotland Group (LSE: RBS) is a British banking and insurance holding company in which the UK Government (HM Treasury) holds an 84% stake.[2]” sources wiki, and “London Stock Exchange – RBS agrees key terms of Asset Protection Scheme, 3 November 2009”.

7. Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial Group; Top stock owners: FISHER INVESTMENTS, INC. at 41,007,509 shares. Owner and CEO of FI is Kenneth L. Fisher. Fisher is an Old English spelling of Fischer, which has it’s roots in England after the Norman Conquest.

8. Mizuho Financial Group; Top stock owner: BRANDES INVESTMENT PARTNERS L.P. at 25,298,600; stock owner: Charles H. Brandes. Brandes surname is Germanic in origin.

9. HBOS; owned by the Lloyds Banking Group; largest stock owner of Lloyds: CITIGROUP INC. at 8,354,258 shares. See above on Citigroup.

10. BNP Paribas; Top stock owners: Due to this French based company being a S.A. company public info on stock ownership is unavailable.

Top Banks list, source

So we can see that the Anglos and other people of European ancestry dominates the banking system, and certainly not the Jews or Zionists. Now lets turn our attention to the “Zionist controls the media” claim.

1. Walt Disney; top stock owner: FMR LLC (Fidelity Investments) at 75,296,433 shares. Aha! So we find the Johnson family popping up again. Also the number 2 largest stockholder is State Street, which has Jay Hooley as CEO. See above for information on both.

2. News Corporation; top stock owner: Capital Research Global Investors, CEO David I. Fisher, Chairman. Another Fisher surname. See above about the Fisher surname. Also, I want to point out that the claim that Rupert Murdoch is Jewish is false, and no, his mother Mrs. Greene is not Jewish…they are of Irish descent.

3. Time Warner; top stock owner: DODGE & COX INC at 55,835,352 shares. This institution is also the second largest stock holder of News Corp. John Gunn is both Chairman and CEO of D&C. The Gunn surname has it’s origins with the Viking settlers of Scotland.

4. CBS Corporation; top stock owner: WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL INC. at 44,852,020 shares (JP Morgan Chase is the second largest stock owner, see above about JP). Guess who’s the top stock owner of W&RF? FMR LLC!! Back to the Johnson family yet again!

5. Viacom; top stock owner: MFC (Manulife Financial) Global Investment Management (U.S.), LLC at 3,245,945 shares. Donald Guloien, President and Chief Executive Officer
Gail C.A. Cook-Bennett, Chair of the Board of Directors. Don’t know of any Jews with the surname Guloien, which appear to be a variant spelling of Gullyen. Bennett: “Bennett is an English and Irish language surname derived from the medieval given name Benedict (Latin, Benedictus, “blessed”).

6. NBCUniversal; subsidiary of General Electric and Comcast; top stock owner of GE: VANGUARD GROUP, INC. at 412,335,282 shares (FMR LLC and STATE STREET are also on the list…again.). William McNabb, President, John J. Brennan, Chairman
John C. Bogle, Founder. McNabb surname is of Scottish origin Brennan, is of Irish origin Bogle, is of German and Scottish origin

7. BBC; public service broadcaster, based in the UK, and led by Lord Patten of Barnes
(Chairman, BBC Trust), Mark Thompson ,(Director-General). The Barnes surname arose in England during the Norman conquest The Thompson surname is Scottish in origin

8. Reuters; owner: Thomson Corp. David Thomson, Shirley Thomson Chairman. The Thomas surname is also Scottish in origin.

So there you have it folks. People mostly of Scottish, Irish, Germanic, and English ancestry dominates ownership of the Media and Banking sectors. So the correct claim is that there are many Jewish employees in both sectors…not owners. Those who promote the myth of Jewish ownership of both sectors, really need to do their homework.

Oh, and you can get this information at Yahoo Finance.

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments